Flagg v. Bellinger et al
Plaintiff: Royal Domingo Flagg
Defendant: Brian Bellinger, (fnu) (lnu), (fnu) Parks, (fnu) Smith, (fnu) Vonfeldt, (fnu) Tripp and (fnu) Kennon
Interested Party: Barton County, Kansas, Sheriff
Case Number: 5:2022cv03280
Filed: October 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: John W Lungstrum
Referring Judge: James P O'Hara
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2022 Filing 17 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Royal Domingo Flagg (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (smnd)
December 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: The motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. #15 ) is denied without prejudice. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 12/05/22. Mailed to pro se party Royal Domingo Flagg by regular mail. (smnd)
December 5, 2022 Filing 15 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Royal Domingo Flagg. (smnd)
December 1, 2022 Filing 14 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Jeffrey M. Kuhlman on behalf of Barton County, Kansas, Sheriff. (Kuhlman, Jeffrey)
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: The motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. #12 ) is denied without prejudice. The Martinez report ordered in the Court's November 15, 2022 order (Doc. #10 ) is now due on or before December 29, 2022. The clerk of the court is directed to mail a copy of this order to the Sheriff of Barton County, Kansas. Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days following the issuance of the Martinez report to file a reply. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 11/29/22. Mailed to pro se party Royal Domingo Flagg and Barton County Sheriff by regular mail. (smnd)
November 29, 2022 Filing 12 MOTION for Injunction for Medical Attention by Plaintiff Royal Domingo Flagg (smnd).
November 29, 2022 MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #12 MOTION for Injunction for Medical Attention. The motion will be resolved by the District Judge. (smnd)
November 23, 2022 INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE PAID on 11/23/2022. Receipt number 200000240, in the amount of $ 101.50. (kmc)
November 21, 2022 Filing 11 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Royal Domingo Flagg re #5 Memorandum and Order. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
November 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: The report required herein shall be filed no later than sixty (60) days from the date of this order, unless the time is extended by the Court. Officials responsible for the operation of the Barton County Jail are directed to undertake a review of the subject matter of the complaint. Upon completion of the review, a written report shall be compiled. The clerk of the court shall enter the Sheriff of Barton County, Kansas as an interested party on the docket for the limited purpose of preparing and filing the Martinez report. Upon the filing of that report, the interested party may move for termination from this action. Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days following the issuance of the Martinez report to file a reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 11/15/22. Mailed to pro se party Royal Domingo Flagg and Sheriff of Barton County, Kansas by regular mail. (smnd)
November 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 AMENDED ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motions to proceed in forma pauperis #2 & #7 are granted. The Court assesses an initial partial filing fee of $101.50, calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff is granted to and including November 29, 2022, to submit the fee. Any objection to this order must be filed on or before the date payment is due. The failure to pay the fee as directed may result in the dismissal of this matter without further notice. Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the remainder of the $350.00 filing fee. The agency having custody of plaintiff shall forward payments from plaintiff's account in installments calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The clerk is to transmit a copy of this order to plaintiff, to the finance office at the institution where plaintiff is currently confined, and to the court's finance office. Entered by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 11/14/22. Mailed to pro se party Royal Domingo Flagg by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd)
November 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #7 is granted. The Court assesses an initial partial filing fee of $101.50, calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff is granted to and including November 14, 2022, to submit the fee. Any objection to this order must be filed on or before the date payment is due. The failure to pay the fee as directed may result in the dismissal of this matter without further notice. Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the remainder of the $350.00 filing fee. The agency having custody of plaintiff shall forward payments from plaintiff's account in installments calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The clerk is to transmit a copy of this order to plaintiff, to the finance office at the institution where plaintiff is currently confined, and to the court's finance office. Entered by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 11/14/22. Mailed to pro se party Royal Domingo Flagg by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd)
November 10, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Royal Domingo Flagg (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Inmate Account Statement, #3 Envelope) (smnd)
November 10, 2022 Filing 6 COMPLAINT (on court-approved form) filed by Plaintiff Royal Domingo Flagg. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
November 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: The motion to amend complaint (Doc. #4 ) is granted. Plaintiff is granted to and including November 28, 2022, to submit a complete amended complaint on court-approved forms. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 11/01/22. Mailed to pro se party Royal Domingo Flagg by regular mail with forms. (smnd)
October 31, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Royal Domingo Flagg (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
October 27, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY mailed to pro se party Royal Domingo Flagg by regular mail. Response deadline 11/28/2022. (smnd)
October 27, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Royal Domingo Flagg (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Attachments: #1 Inmate History Report, #2 Envelope) (smnd)
October 27, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Royal Domingo Flagg. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Flagg v. Bellinger et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Royal Domingo Flagg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Bellinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: (fnu) (lnu)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: (fnu) Parks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: (fnu) Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: (fnu) Vonfeldt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: (fnu) Tripp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: (fnu) Kennon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Barton County, Kansas, Sheriff
Represented By: Jeffrey M. Kuhlman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?