Clark v. Cahill et al
Plaintiff: Richard Leroy Clark, Jr.
Defendant: Daniel Cahill, Tonda Hill, Candice Alcaraz, Mark Dupree, Derek Schmidt, Brett Richman, Cline Boone, Scarlett Webb and (fnu) Martinez
Case Number: 5:2022cv03305
Filed: December 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: John W Lungstrum
Referring Judge: James P O'Hara
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2023 Filing 15 Letter to the Court from Plaintiff Richard Leroy Clark, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
January 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. #13 ) is denied. This case remains closed. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 1/27/2023. Mailed to pro se party Richard Leroy Clark, Jr. by regular mail. (jal)
January 26, 2023 Filing 13 MOTION for Reconsideration re #10 Memorandum and Order by Plaintiff Richard Leroy Clark, Jr. (Attachment: #1 Envelope)(smnd) Modified on 1/26/2023 to remove referral text. (kao)
January 26, 2023 MINUTE ORDER - Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara no longer assigned to case. Signed by deputy clerk on 1/26/23. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(kao)
January 20, 2023 Filing 12 SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE by Plaintiff Richard Leroy Clark, Jr. re #5 Memorandum and Order to Show Cause. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
January 18, 2023 Filing 11 JUDGMENT regarding Memorandum and Order #10 dismissing matter for failure to state a claim. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 01/18/23. Mailed to pro se party Richard Leroy Clark, Jr. by regular mail. (smnd)
January 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: This matter is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. #7 ) is denied as moot. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 01/18/23. Mailed to pro se party Richard Leroy Clark, Jr. by regular mail. (smnd)
January 17, 2023 Filing 9 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE by Plaintiff Richard Leroy Clark, Jr. re #5 Memorandum and Order to Show Cause. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
January 12, 2023 Filing 8 RESPONSE re #5 Memorandum and Order to Show Cause by Plaintiff Richard Leroy Clark, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
January 9, 2023 Filing 7 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Richard Leroy Clark, Jr. (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
January 9, 2023 Filing 6 RESPONSE re #5 Memorandum and Order to Show Cause by Plaintiff Richard Leroy Clark, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
December 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted until January 17, 2023, in which to show good cause, in writing to the undersigned, why Plaintiff's Complaint should not be dismissed. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 12/29/22. Mailed to pro se party Richard Leroy Clark, Jr. by regular mail. (smnd)
December 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees #3 is granted because plaintiff's trust fund account statement shows that he has insufficient funds to pay an initial partial filing fee. Notwithstanding this grant of leave, plaintiff is required to pay the full amount of the filing fee and is hereby assessed $350.00. Plaintiff is required to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's account. The agency having custody of plaintiff shall forward payments from the prisoner's account to the clerk of the court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the filing fees are paid. 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The clerk is to transmit a copy of this order to plaintiff, to the finance office at the institution where plaintiff is currently confined, and to the court's finance office. Entered by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 12/29/22. Mailed to pro se party Richard Leroy Clark, Jr. by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd)
December 29, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Richard Leroy Clark, Jr. (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Attachments: #1 Inmate Balance History Report, #2 Envelope) (smnd)
December 16, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY: Response deadline 1/17/2023. Mailed to pro se party Richard Leroy Clark, Jr. by regular mail. (jal)
December 16, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Richard Leroy Clark, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clark v. Cahill et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Leroy Clark, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Cahill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tonda Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Candice Alcaraz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Dupree
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Derek Schmidt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brett Richman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cline Boone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scarlett Webb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: (fnu) Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?