Smith v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
| Nathan Smith |
| Social Security Administration, Commissioner of |
| Social Security Regional Administrator |
| 5:2022cv04017 |
| March 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kathryn H Vratil |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 RETURN Mail received re #10 Order, addressed to Nathan Smith. Not Remailed. (jal) |
| Filing 11 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Christopher Allman on behalf of Social Security Administration, Commissioner of. (Allman, Christopher) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (issued to US Marshal for service). (jsh) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff must update his mailing address with the Clerk's Office. See D. Kan. Rule 5.1(c)(3) ("Each attorney or pro se party must notify the clerk in writing of any change of address or telephone number."). The Clerk is ordered to transmit a copy of this order to Plaintiff and issue summons to the U.S. Marshal or Deputy Marshal, who are appointed to execute service on the Defendant pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). Signed by Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz on 4/21/2022. Mailed to pro se party Nathan Smith by regular mail. (jal)
|
| Filing 9 RETURN Mail received re #7 Memorandum and Order, addressed to Nathan D. Smith. Not remailed. (kas) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER ASSIGNING MAGISTRATE JUDGE TO CASE: Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz. Signed by deputy clerk on 4/4/22. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(kao) |
|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER overruling #3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 4/4/2022. Memorandum & Order and a copy of District of Kansas local rule 83.7.1. mailed to pro se party Nathan Smith by regular mail. (ca)
|
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT to #3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Nathan Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (jsh) |
| Filing 5 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Nathan Smith - trial to be held in Topeka. DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY by Nathan Smith. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jsh) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Nathan Smith. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jsh) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Nathan Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (NOTE: THIS IS A REFILING OF D.E. #1 FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PURPOSES.) (jsh) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Nathan Smith. NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Statement) (jsh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (No Summons Issued) with trial location of Topeka, filed by Nathan Smith. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jsh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/21/2022: #2 Exhibits; #3 Letter to Clerk). (jsh) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Designation of place of trial is missing.Civil cover sheet is missing. The filing party/attorney is directed to correct the deficiency immediately. Mailed to pro se plaintiff Nathan Smith by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jsh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
