Radig v. Wilgus et al
| Heather Marie Radig |
| Off. Jason Wilgus, Sgt. (fnu) Supanic and Off. (fnu) Ewy |
| 5:2022cv04022 |
| April 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Gwynne E Birzer |
| Holly L Teeter |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to (fnu) Ewy, (fnu) Supanic, Jason Wilgus. (issued to US Marshal for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (jsh) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying #4 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 6/2/2022. Mailed to pro se party Heather Marie Radig by regular mail. (kas)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Heather Marie Radig. (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (jsh) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Heather Marie Radig. NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Financial Status) (jsh) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Heather Marie Radig. (jsh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (No Summons Issued) with trial location of Topeka, filed by Heather Marie Radig. (jsh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
