Bryson v. Wichita, City of et al
| James Luther Bryson |
| Wichita, City of, Sedgwick County, Kansas, Comcare, St. Francis Hospital, St. Joseph Hospital, Humankind, (fnu) (lnu), 21st Street Market and Mental Health Association of Kansas |
| 5:2022cv04037 |
| July 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kenneth G Gale |
| Holly L Teeter |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
RETURN MAIL received re #9 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation, #10 Judgment addressed to James Luther Bryson. (mam)
|
|
Filing 10
JUDGMENT. Signed by deputy clerk on 8/3/2022. Mailed to pro se party James Luther Bryson by regular mail. (ca)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER ADOPTING #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff's case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Holly L. Teeter on 8/3/2022. Mailed to pro se party James Luther Bryson by regular mail. (ca)
|
|
Filing 8
RETURN certified mail received re #4 Memorandum and Order and #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, addressed to James Luther Bryson. Not remailed. (kas)
|
|
NOTICE Re: Pro Se Mailing. Document #4 Memorandum and Order and #5 Report and Recommendations remailed to James Luther Bryson on 8/1/2022 by certified mail; Certified Tracking Number 70161970000113655231 to address 350 N. Market Street, Wichita, KS 67202. (kas)
|
|
Filing 7
OBJECTION to #5 Report and Recommendations by Plaintiff James Luther Bryson. (heo)
|
|
Filing 6
RETURN Certified Mail received re #4 , #5 addressed to James Luther Bryson 350 N. Market Place, Wichita, KS 67202. Not remailed. (jk)
|
|
NOTICE Re: Pro Se Mailing. Document #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS mailed to James Luther Bryson at 265 N. Market Street, Wichita, KS 67202 on 7/20/2022 by certified mail; Certified Tracking Number 7020 0640 0000 5372 9267. (jk)
|
|
Filing 5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Dismissal re #1 Complaint filed by James Luther Bryson. This document also serves as the Order on Plaintiff's IFP motion. The document is included in the Court's docketing system as two entries for administrative/tracking purposes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 7/722.Mailed to pro se party James Luther Bryson by certified mail. (df)
|
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. This document also serves as the Report & Recommendation of Dismissal to the District Court. It is included in the Court's docketing system as two documents for administrative/tracking purposes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 7/7/22.Mailed to pro se party James Luther Bryson by certified mail. (df)
|
|
NOTICE Re: Pro Se Mailing. Document #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint filed by James Luther Bryson, #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, mailed to James Luther Bryson on 7/7/2022 by certified mail ; Certified Tracking Number 70190700000059274803. (cc)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff James Luther Bryson. NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. (referred to Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Financial Status) (jsh)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff James Luther Bryson. (jsh)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT (No Summons Issued) with trial location of Topeka, filed by James Luther Bryson. (jsh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
