Dahda v. Hudson
| Roosevelt Rico Dahda |
| D. Hudson |
| 5:2023cv03008 |
| January 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| John W Lungstrum |
| James P O'Hara |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 JUDGMENT ENTERED: re #7 Memorandum and Order denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Signed by deputy clerk on 3/7/2023. Mailed to pro se party Roosevelt Rico Dahda by regular mail. (jal) |
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: The petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 (Doc. #1 ) is hereby denied. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 3/7/2023. Mailed to pro se party Roosevelt Rico Dahda by regular mail. (jal)
|
| Filing 6 TRAVERSE by Petitioner Roosevelt Rico Dahda re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Response to Order to Show Cause by D. Hudson. (Attachments: #1 Index, #2 Attachment One, #3 Exhibit A to Attachment One, #4 Exhibit B to Attachment One, #5 Exhibit C to Attachment One, #6 Exhibit D to Attachment One, #7 Exhibit E to Attachment One, #8 Exhibit F to Attachment One, #9 Attachment Two)(Brookreson, Steven) |
| MINUTE ORDER - Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara no longer assigned to case. Signed by deputy clerk on 1/23/23. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(kao) |
| HABEAS FILING FEE PAID: in the amount of $ 5.00, receipt number 200000377. (jsh) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Roosevelt Rico Dahda. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11) (mam) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Respondent is required to show cause on or before February 13, 2023, why the writ should not be granted. Petitioner is granted until March 15, 2023, to file a traverse thereto. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 01/12/23. Mailed to pro se party Roosevelt Rico Dahda by regular mail; e-mailed to the United States Attorney for the District of Kansas. (smnd)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY mailed to pro se party Roosevelt Rico Dahda by regular mail. Response deadline 2/13/2023. (smnd) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS filed by Petitioner Roosevelt Rico Dahda. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dahda v. Hudson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Roosevelt Rico Dahda | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: D. Hudson | |
| Represented By: | Steven W. Brookreson, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
