Martin v. Great Bend Police Department et al
Plaintiff: Clayton J. Martin
Defendant: Great Bend Police Department, Shane Becker, Taylor Reed and Levi Hallman
Case Number: 5:2023cv03039
Filed: February 10, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: John W Lungstrum
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #11 ) is granted. This action is dismissed without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 02/28/23. Mailed to pro se party Clayton J. Martin by regular mail. (smnd)
February 27, 2023 Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss by Plaintiff Clayton J. Martin. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
February 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is granted. The Court assesses an initial partial filing fee of $27.00, calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff is granted to and including March 9, 2023, to submit the fee. Any objection to this order must be filed on or before the date payment is due. The failure to pay the fee as directed may result in the dismissal of this matter without further notice. Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the remainder of the $350.00 filing fee. The agency having custody of plaintiff shall forward payments from plaintiff's account in installments calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The clerk is to transmit a copy of this order to plaintiff, to the finance office at the institution where plaintiff is currently confined, and to the court's finance office. Entered by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 02/23/23. Mailed to pro se party Clayton J. Martin by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd)
February 22, 2023 Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT re #7 Notice of Deficiency by Plaintiff Clayton J. Martin. (Attachments: #1 Resident Account Summary, #2 Envelope) (smnd)
February 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: The Court provisionally grants Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #4 ). Plaintiff remains obligated to provide his financial information by March 15, 2023, as set forth in this Court's Notice of Deficiency at Doc. #7 . Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. #6 ) is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff is granted until March 15, 2023, in which to show good cause, in writing to the undersigned, why Plaintiff's Complaint should not be dismissed. Plaintiff is also granted until March 15, 2023, in which to file a complete and proper amended complaint to cure all the deficiencies. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 2/16/23. Mailed to pro se party Clayton J. Martin with 1983 forms and instructions by regular mail. (smnd)
February 13, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis mailed to pro se party Clayton J. Martin by regular mail. Response deadline 3/15/2023. (smnd)
February 10, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Clayton J. Martin. (smnd)
February 10, 2023 Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Financial Status re #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Clayton J. Martin. (smnd)
February 10, 2023 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Clayton J. Martin. (smnd)
February 10, 2023 Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT by Plaintiff Clayton J. Martin. (smnd)
February 10, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Clayton J. Martin. (smnd)
February 10, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Clayton J. Martin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Envelope) (smnd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin v. Great Bend Police Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clayton J. Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Great Bend Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shane Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Taylor Reed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Levi Hallman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?