Martin v. Great Bend Police Department et al
Clayton J. Martin |
Great Bend Police Department, Shane Becker, Taylor Reed and Levi Hallman |
5:2023cv03039 |
February 10, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
John W Lungstrum |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #11 ) is granted. This action is dismissed without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 02/28/23. Mailed to pro se party Clayton J. Martin by regular mail. (smnd) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss by Plaintiff Clayton J. Martin. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
Filing 10 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is granted. The Court assesses an initial partial filing fee of $27.00, calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff is granted to and including March 9, 2023, to submit the fee. Any objection to this order must be filed on or before the date payment is due. The failure to pay the fee as directed may result in the dismissal of this matter without further notice. Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the remainder of the $350.00 filing fee. The agency having custody of plaintiff shall forward payments from plaintiff's account in installments calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The clerk is to transmit a copy of this order to plaintiff, to the finance office at the institution where plaintiff is currently confined, and to the court's finance office. Entered by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 02/23/23. Mailed to pro se party Clayton J. Martin by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd) |
Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT re #7 Notice of Deficiency by Plaintiff Clayton J. Martin. (Attachments: #1 Resident Account Summary, #2 Envelope) (smnd) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: The Court provisionally grants Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #4 ). Plaintiff remains obligated to provide his financial information by March 15, 2023, as set forth in this Court's Notice of Deficiency at Doc. #7 . Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. #6 ) is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff is granted until March 15, 2023, in which to show good cause, in writing to the undersigned, why Plaintiff's Complaint should not be dismissed. Plaintiff is also granted until March 15, 2023, in which to file a complete and proper amended complaint to cure all the deficiencies. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 2/16/23. Mailed to pro se party Clayton J. Martin with 1983 forms and instructions by regular mail. (smnd) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis mailed to pro se party Clayton J. Martin by regular mail. Response deadline 3/15/2023. (smnd) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Clayton J. Martin. (smnd) |
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Financial Status re #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Clayton J. Martin. (smnd) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Clayton J. Martin. (smnd) |
Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT by Plaintiff Clayton J. Martin. (smnd) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Clayton J. Martin. (smnd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Clayton J. Martin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Envelope) (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.