Price v. Robeson et al
| John Timothy Price |
| Corey Robeson and Ted G. Baird |
| 5:2023cv03065 |
| March 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| John W Lungstrum |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT regarding #3 Memorandum and Order dismissing action without prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 04/03/23. Mailed to pro se party John Timothy Price by regular mail. (smnd) |
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: This action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 04/03/23. Mailed to pro se party John Timothy Price by regular mail. (smnd)
|
|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is granted until March 31, 2023, to submit the $402.00 filing fee. The failure to submit the fee by that date will result in the dismissal of this matter without prejudice and without additional prior notice. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 3/7/2023. Mailed to pro se party John Timothy Price by regular mail. (jal)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff John Timothy Price. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
