Ellis v. Payne
| Shawn E. Ellis |
| Kevin Payne |
| 5:2023cv03075 |
| March 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| John W Lungstrum |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER ENTERED: Respondent's motion to stay proceedings in this case (Doc. #4 ) is granted. This case is stayed until an opinion has been issued in the Anderson case and any direct appeal from that decision has been completed, or until further order of this Court. Respondent is directed to notify the Court when the stay is to be lifted, and the Court will issue further orders at that time. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 05/02/23. Mailed to pro se party Shawn E. Ellis by regular mail. (smnd)
|
| Filing 7 REPLY TO RESPONSE TO MOTION by Respondent Kevin Payne re: #4 Motion to Stay Case (Maag, Jared) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE by Petitioner Shawn E. Ellis re #4 Motion to Stay Proceedings. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER ENTERED: Petitioner shall file any response to respondent's motion to stay the case (Doc. #4 ) on or before April 19, 2023; and respondent shall file any reply in support of the motion on or before May 3, 2023. The deadlines previously set for respondent's answer and petitioner's traverse are hereby vacated and shall be reset after the Court rules on the motion to stay. Entered by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 3/29/2023. Mailed to pro se party Shawn E. Ellis by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(jal)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Stay Case re #2 Order to Show Cause,, Set Deadlines, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Respondent Kevin Payne (Maag, Jared) |
| Filing 3 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Jared S. Maag on behalf of Kevin Payne. (Maag, Jared) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Respondent is required to show cause on or before April 21, 2023, why the writ should not be granted; and petitioner is granted until May 22, 2023, to file a traverse. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 03/22/23. Mailed to pro se party Shawn E. Ellis by regular mail; e-mailed to the United States Attorney for the District of Kansas. (smnd)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS filed by Petitioner Shawn E. Ellis. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A, #2 Appendix B, #3 Appendix C, #4 Envelope) (smnd) |
| FILING FEE PAID: in the amount of $ 5.00, receipt number 500000511. (jal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ellis v. Payne | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Shawn E. Ellis | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Kevin Payne | |
| Represented By: | Jared S. Maag |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
