Foster (ID 92016) v. Geither et al
Rory Markel Foster and Rory Marcel Foster |
Gloria Geither, Jeff Zmuda and Immigration and Customs Enforcement |
5:2023cv03089 |
March 30, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
John W Lungstrum |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 RECORD ON APPEAL retrieved by 10CCA consisting of Volume I - Pleadings re #9 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment. (Appeal No. 23-3065) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd) |
Filing 14 ORDER of 10CCA: Upon consideration of the district court's April 26 order, we have determined that the abatement of this appeal should be lifted. (Appeal No. 23-3065) (smnd) |
Filing 13 ORDER ENTERED: No certificate of appealability will issue. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 04/26/23. Mailed to pro se party Rory Markel Foster by regular mail. (smnd) |
Filing 12 ORDER of 10CCA: The district court did not address whether a COA should issue, and Appellant has not requested a COA from the district court. Therefore, we direct a limited remand to the district court to consider whether to issue a COA for this appeal. Pending a decision by the district court, this appeal is abated. (Appeal No. 23-3065) (smnd) |
Filing 11 APPEAL DOCKETED in 10CCA on April 25, 2023, and assigned Appeal No. 23-3065 re #9 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment filed by Rory Markel Foster. (smnd) |
Filing 10 PRELIMINARY RECORD ON APPEAL transmitted to 10CCA re #9 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment. (Attachments: #1 Preliminary Packet) (smnd) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #7 Memorandum and Order and #8 Judgment by Petitioner Rory Markel Foster. (smnd) |
APPEAL FEE STATUS: filing fee not paid re: Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment #9 on behalf of Petitioner Rory Markel Foster. (THIS IS A TEXT ONLY ENTRY-NO DOCUMENT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION.) (smnd) |
Filing 8 JUDGMENT regarding #7 Memorandum and Order dismissing matter. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 04/20/23. Mailed to pro se party Rory Markel Foster by regular mail. (smnd) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: The matter is dismissed. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 04/20/23. Mailed to pro se party Rory Markel Foster by regular mail. (smnd) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE by Petitioner Rory Markel Foster re #5 Order to Show Cause. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit D, #2 Exhibit E, #3 Exhibit G, #4 Letter to Clerk of the Court) (smnd) |
Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #3 ) is granted. Petitioner is granted until April 28, 2023, in which to show good cause why the Petition should not be dismissed. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 04/03/23. Mailed to pro se party Rory Markel Foster by regular mail. (smnd) |
Filing 4 Letter to Clerk of District Court from Petitioner Rory Markel Foster. (smnd) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Rory Markel Foster. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Statement) (smnd) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Rory Markel Foster. (smnd) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS filed by Petitioner Rory Markel Foster. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-C) (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.