Barnes (ID 62985) v. Bennett et al
Gordon Raul Barnes |
Marc Bennett and Kris Kobach |
5:2023cv03105 |
April 14, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
John W Lungstrum |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 8 MOTION for Reconsideration re #6 Memorandum and Order by Plaintiff Gordon Raul Barnes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (smnd) |
Filing 7 JUDGMENT regarding #6 Memorandum and Order dismissing matter as frivolous. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 04/20/23. Mailed to pro se party Gordon Raul Barnes by regular mail. (smnd) |
![]() |
Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Gordon Raul Barnes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit E) (smnd) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis mailed to pro se party Gordon Raul Barnes by regular mail. Response deadline 5/15/2023. (smnd) |
Filing 3 Letter to the Clerk from Plaintiff Gordon Raul Barnes regarding #1 Complaint (titled Petition for Redress of Grievance). (smnd) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Gordon Raul Barnes. (Attachments: #1 2011-2022 W-2s) (smnd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (titled Petition for Redress of Grievance) filed by Plaintiff Gordon Raul Barnes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit F; no Exhibit E submitted.) (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.