Srader v. United States of America et al
Nicholas A. Srader |
United States of America, Merrick Garland, (fnu) (lnu) (1), (fnu) (lnu) (2), Andre Matevousian, D. Hudson, (fnu) Amigo, (fnu) Diriden, (fnu) Keller, (fnu) Sutton, (fnu) (lnu) (3), Sean Foley, Jason Clark, (fnu) Peterson, (fnu) Grecco, (fnu) Lamont, (fnu) (lnu) (4), Andrea Matevousian and Ian Connor |
5:2023cv03178 |
July 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
John W Lungstrum |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion for order to show cause (Doc. #18 ) is denied. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 09/14/23. Mailed to pro se party Nicholas A. Srader by regular mail. (smnd) |
Filing 18 MOTION for Order to Show Cause (titled Order to Show Cause for Preliminary Injunction) by Plaintiff Nicholas A. Srader. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF #9 Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Nicholas A. Srader. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (smnd) |
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted to and including October 10, 2023, to file a complete and proper second amended complaint on the court-approved form that cures the deficiencies discussed in this order. If Plaintiff fails to timely file a second amended complaint that cures the deficiencies, this matter may be dismissed without further prior notice to Plaintiff. The clerk is directed to send Bivens forms and instructions to Plaintiff. Plaintiff's motions (Doc. #11 , #12 , #13 , #14 , and #15 ) are denied without prejudice for the reasons stated in this order. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 9/8/2023. Mailed to pro se party Nicholas A. Srader by regular mail. (jal) |
Filing 15 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (titled Affidavit in Support of Order to Show Cause) by Plaintiff Nicholas A. Srader. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support, #2 Envelope) (jal) |
Filing 14 MOTION to Supplement (titled Motion to Request to Add Additional Documents) by Plaintiff Nicholas A. Srader. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (jal) |
INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE PAID on 9/1/2023. Receipt number 200000938, in the amount of $85.00. (jsh) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Nicholas A. Srader. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Supplement (titled Motion for Request to Submit Additional Documents) by Plaintiff Nicholas A. Srader. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope) (smnd) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Supplement (titled Motion for Request to Submit Additional Documents) by Plaintiff Nicholas A. Srader. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope) (smnd) |
Filing 10 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #6 is granted. The Court assesses an initial partial filing fee of $85.00, calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff is granted to and including September 6, 2023, to submit the fee. Any objection to this order must be filed on or before the date payment is due. The failure to pay the fee as directed may result in the dismissal of this matter without further notice. Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the remainder of the $350.00 filing fee. The agency having custody of plaintiff shall forward payments from plaintiff's account in installments calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The clerk is to transmit a copy of this order to plaintiff, to the finance office at the institution where plaintiff is currently confined, and to the court's finance office. Entered by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 08/23/23. Mailed to pro se party Nicholas A. Srader by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd) |
Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Nicholas A. Srader. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Envelope) (jal) |
Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT to #5 MOTION to Amend Complaint re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Nicholas A. Srader. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jal) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: The motion to appoint counsel (Doc. #3 ) is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff may refile the motion if the material circumstances change. The motion to amend the complaint (Doc. #5 ) is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff is granted to and including September 5, 2023, to file a complete and proper amended complaint on the court-approved form that cures the deficiencies discussed herein. If Plaintiff fails to timely file an amended complaint that cures the deficiencies, this matter may be dismissed without further prior notice to Plaintiff. The clerk is directed to send Bivens forms and instructions to Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 8/1/2023. (jal) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Nicholas A. Srader. (jal) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Amend Complaint re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Nicholas A. Srader. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amended Complaint, #2 Envelope) (jal) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY mailed to pro se party Nicholas A. Srader by regular mail. Response deadline 8/21/2023. (smnd) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Nicholas A. Srader. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
Filing 2 DECLARATION in Support of Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Nicholas A. Srader. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Statement, #2 Envelope) (smnd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Nicholas A. Srader. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.