Lund (ID 75009) v. Miller et al
| Dustin Lee Lund |
| Lou Miller and Russell Thornton |
| 5:2023cv03184 |
| July 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| John W Lungstrum |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address by Dustin Lee Lund #75009: now at Oswego Correctional Facility, 2501 7th Street, Oswego, KS 67356. (jal) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Dustin Lee Lund. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter) (jal) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Pursuant to the #6 Memorandum and Order to Show Cause filed August 18, 2023, Plaintiff Dustin Lee Lund submitted an Amended Complaint for filing. The Amended Complaint was returned to Plaintiff Lund because he is incarcerated in a facility with mandatory electronic filing and should follow instructions available at the facility for transmitting pleadings electronically to the court. (smnd) |
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted until September 18, 2023, in which to show good cause, in writing, why Plaintiff's Complaint should not be dismissed for the reasons stated herein. Plaintiff is also granted until September 18, 2023, in which to file a complete and proper amended complaint to cure all the deficiencies discussed herein. Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. #3 ) is denied without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to send 1983 forms and instructions to Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 8/18/2023. Mailed to pro se party Dustin Lee Lund by regular mail. (jal)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by Dustin Lee Lund #75009: now at El Dorado Correctional Facility, P.O. Box 311, El Dorado, KS 67402. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jal) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is granted. The Court assesses an initial partial filing fee of $1.50, calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff is granted to and including August 10, 2023, to submit the fee. Any objection to this order must be filed on or before the date payment is due. The failure to pay the fee as directed may result in the dismissal of this matter without further notice. Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the remainder of the $350.00 filing fee. The agency having custody of plaintiff shall forward payments from plaintiff's account in installments calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The clerk is to transmit a copy of this order to plaintiff, to the finance office at the institution where plaintiff is currently confined, and to the court's finance office. Entered by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 07/27/23. Mailed to pro se party Dustin Lee Lund by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Dustin Lee Lund. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Dustin Lee Lund. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Summary, #2 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Dustin Lee Lund. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Pursuant to the Kansas Department of Corrections, Plaintiff Dustin Lee Lund has been at El Dorado Correctional Facility since July 26, 2023. Therefore, Plaintiff Lund's address has been updated on the docket sheet. (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
