Steele v. Davis et al
Plaintiff: Lamar Ray Steele, Jr.
Defendant: Ronald L. Davis, D. Hudson, (fnu) Grecco, Michael Naller, (fnu) B., (fnu) Gulley, (fnu) Collins, (fnu) Toot, Brooke Crane and Jason Clark
Case Number: 5:2023cv03192
Filed: August 9, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Topeka Office
Presiding Judge: John W Lungstrum
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. #11 ) is granted. The deadline for Plaintiff to file a response to the MOSC (Doc. #8 ) is extended to November 16, 2023. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 10/02/23. Mailed to pro se party Lamar Ray Steele, Jr. by regular mail. (smnd)
September 29, 2023 Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Lamar Ray Steele, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
September 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. #9 ) is granted. The deadline for Plaintiff to file a response to the MOSC (Doc. #8 ) is extended to October 16, 2023. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 9/22/2023. Mailed to pro se party Lamar Ray Steele Jr. by regular mail. (jal)
September 21, 2023 Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to #8 Memorandum and Order to Show Cause (titled: Request for Continuance for a Civil Lawsuit #23-3192) by Plaintiff Lamar Ray Steele, Jr. (jal)
August 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted until September 25, 2023, in which to show good cause, in writing, why Plaintiff's Complaint should not be dismissed for the reasons stated herein. Plaintiff is also granted until September 25, 2023, in which to file a complete and proper amended complaint to cure all the deficiencies discussed herein. Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. #5 ) is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's Motion requesting injunctive relief (Doc. #6 ) is denied. The clerk is directed to send 1331 forms and instructions to Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 8/25/2023. Mailed to pro se party Lamar Ray Steele, Jr. by regular mail. (jal)
August 17, 2023 INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE PAID: in the amount of $46.50, receipt number 500000859. (nao)
August 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is granted. The Court assesses an initial partial filing fee of $46.50, calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff is granted to and including August 24, 2023, to submit the fee. Any objection to this order must be filed on or before the date payment is due. The failure to pay the fee as directed may result in the dismissal of this matter without further notice. Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the remainder of the $350.00 filing fee. The agency having custody of plaintiff shall forward payments from plaintiff's account in installments calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The clerk is to transmit a copy of this order to plaintiff, to the finance office at the institution where plaintiff is currently confined, and to the court's finance office. Entered by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 08/10/23. Mailed to pro se party Lamar Ray Steele, Jr. by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd)
August 9, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION for Order to Show Cause by Plaintiff Lamar Ray Steele, Jr. (jal)
August 9, 2023 Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Lamar Ray Steele, Jr. (jal)
August 9, 2023 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Lamar Ray Steele, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Account Transaction Summary, #2 Declaration in Support) (jal)
August 9, 2023 Filing 3 DECLARATION of Dontae Strother re #1 Complaint by Lamar Ray Steele, Jr. (jal)
August 9, 2023 Filing 2 DECLARATION of Lamar Ray Steele Jr. re #1 Complaint by Lamar Ray Steele, Jr. (jal)
August 9, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Lamar Ray Steele, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Supplemental Complaint, #2 Exhibits in Support) (jal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Steele v. Davis et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lamar Ray Steele, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ronald L. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. Hudson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: (fnu) Grecco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Naller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: (fnu) B.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: (fnu) Gulley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: (fnu) Collins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: (fnu) Toot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brooke Crane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jason Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?