Williams v. Bond et al
Plaintiff: Freddie Williams
Defendant: Jonathan Bond and (fnu) (lnu)
Case Number: 5:2023cv03196
Filed: August 17, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Topeka Office
Presiding Judge: John W Lungstrum
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2023 Filing 9 JUDGMENT regarding #8 Memorandum and Order dismissing action without prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 09/21/23. Mailed to pro se party Freddie Williams by regular mail. (smnd)
September 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: This action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 09/21/23. Mailed to pro se party Freddie Williams by regular mail. (smnd)
September 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion (Doc. #5 ) is denied. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 09/14/23. Mailed to pro se party Freddie Williams by regular mail. (smnd)
September 11, 2023 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Freddie Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope) (smnd)
September 11, 2023 Filing 5 MOTION to Alter or Amend #1 Complaint (Amend the Judgment) or Motion for Leave to Amend Judgment by Plaintiff Freddie Williams. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
September 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion for extension of time (Doc. #3 ) is denied. The full filing fee remains due on or before September 18, 2023. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 9/5/2023. Mailed to pro se party Freddie Williams by regular mail. (jal)
September 1, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to #2 Memorandum and Order by Plaintiff Freddie Williams. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support, #2 Envelope) (jal)
August 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted until September 18, 2023, to submit the $402.00 filing fee. The failure to submit the fee by that date will result in the dismissal of this matter without prejudice and without additional prior notice. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 8/18/2023. Mailed to pro se party Freddie Williams by regular mail. (jal)
August 17, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Freddie Williams. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Bond et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Freddie Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jonathan Bond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: (fnu) (lnu)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?