Hill v. Torrazaz et al
| Devenion Sentell Hill, Jr. |
| E. Torrazaz, L. Slupski, (fnu) Jolly, Wellpath LLC, M. Johnson, (fnu) Ramirez, David Thaxton, D. Dull, (fnu) Omi and Unified Government of Wyandotte County |
| 5:2023cv03198 |
| August 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| John W Lungstrum |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 JUDGMENT regarding #11 Memorandum and Order dismissing matter without prejudice for failure to state a claim. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 09/27/23. Mailed to pro se party Devenion Sentell Hill, Jr. by regular mail. (smnd) |
Filing 11
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: This matter is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. Because the Court dismisses the matter, the pending motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #6 ) will be denied as moot. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 09/27/23. Mailed to pro se party Devenion Stentell Hill, Jr. by regular mail. (smnd)
|
| Filing 10 EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of #8 Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Devenion Sentell Hill, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE (titled Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis) by Plaintiff Devenion Sentell Hill, Jr. re #7 Memorandum and Order. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against D. Dull, (fnu) Omi, L. Slupski, David Thaxton, E. Torrazaz, Unified Government of Wyandotte County and Wellpath LLC filed by Plaintiff Devenion Sentell Hill, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted to and including September 25, 2023, to supplement his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #6 ) with the additional information described in this order. Because Plaintiff has filed a second motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #6 ), his initial motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #3 ) is denied as moot. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 9/5/2023. Mailed to pro se party Devenion Sentell Hill Jr. by regular mail. (jal)
|
| Filing 6 ADDITIONAL MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Devenion Sentell Hill, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Balance History Report, #2 Envelope) (jal) |
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted to and including September 25, 2023, to file a complete and proper amended complaint that cures all the deficiencies. The clerk is directed to send 1983 forms and instructions to Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 08/24/23. Mailed to pro se party Devenion Sentell Hill, Jr. with 1983 forms and instructions by regular mail. (smnd)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis mailed to pro se party Devenion Sentell Hill, Jr. by regular mail. Response deadline 9/21/2023. (smnd) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Devenion Sentell Hill, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Wyandotte Commissary Statement, #2 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Response deadline 9/18/2023. Mailed to pro se party Devenion Sentell Hill Jr. by regular mail. (jal) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Devenion Sentell Hill, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
