Fowler (ID 126080) v. Topeka Correctional Facility et al
Katelynn J. Fowler |
Topeka Correctional Facility and (fnu) Clark |
5:2023cv03218 |
October 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
John W Lungstrum |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 RETURN mail received re #5 Memorandum and Order and #6 Judgment addressed to Katelynn J. Fowler (Return to Sender/Resident No Longer at TCF Facility); Not Remailed. (smnd) |
Filing 6 JUDGMENT regarding #5 Memorandum and Order dismissing action without prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 11/14/23. Mailed to pro se party Katelynn J. Fowler by regular mail. (smnd) |
|
INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE PAID: in the amount of $9.50, receipt number 500000967. (nac) |
|
|
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Katelynn J. Fowler. NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Statement, #2 Envelope) (smnd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Katelynn J. Fowler. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope) (smnd) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION: Notice sent to Plaintiff Katelynn J. Fowler stating she is incarcerated in a facility with mandatory electronic filing and should follow instructions available at the facility for transmitting pleadings electronically to the court. (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.