McLemore v. Peterson et al
Plaintiff: Jeffrey L. McLemore
Defendant: Jacob E. Peterson and Rene S. Young
Case Number: 5:2023cv03220
Filed: October 2, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: John W Lungstrum
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2023 Filing 7 JUDGMENT regarding #6 Memorandum and Order dismissing action without prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 11/14/23. Mailed to pro se party Jeffrey L. McLemore by regular mail. (smnd)
November 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted and, in the alternative, for failure to comply with a court order. The pending motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Docs. #2 and #5 ) are denied as moot. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 11/14/23. Mailed to pro se party Jeffrey L. McLemore by regular mail. (smnd)
October 16, 2023 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jeffrey L. McLemore. NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. (jal)
October 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted until November 6, 2023, in which to show good cause, in writing to the undersigned, why Plaintiff's Complaint should not be dismissed without prejudice for the reasons stated in this order. Plaintiff is also granted until November 6, 2023, in which to file a complete and proper amended complaint that cures the deficiency discussed in this order. The Clerk is directed to send 1983 forms and instructions to Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 10/6/2023. Mailed to pro se party Jeffrey L. McLemore by regular mail. (jal)
October 3, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis mailed to pro se party Jeffrey L. McLemore by regular mail. Response deadline 11/2/2023. (smnd)
October 2, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jeffrey L. McLemore. NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. (smnd)
October 2, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey L. McLemore. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-C, #2 Envelope) (smnd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McLemore v. Peterson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey L. McLemore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jacob E. Peterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rene S. Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?