DeBella v. Topeka Fire Department et al
| Robert Trent DeBella |
| Topeka Fire Department, Jay Fish, Liz (lnu), Donny (lnu) and (fnu) King |
| 5:2023cv03255 |
| December 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| John W Lungstrum |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 RETURN mail received re #9 Memorandum and Order and #10 Judgment addressed to Plaintiff Robert Trent DeBella (Return to Sender/Inmate No Longer at Facility); Not Remailed. (smnd) |
| Filing 10 JUDGMENT regarding #9 Memorandum and Order dismissing matter. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 01/16/24. Mailed to pro se party Robert Trent DeBella by regular mail at Jackson County Jail and 1501 SW Van Buren Street, Topeka, Kansas 66612. (smnd) |
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: This matter is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 01/16/24. Mailed to pro se party Robert Trent DeBella by regular mail at Jackson County Jail and 1501 SW Van Buren Street, Topeka, Kansas 66612. (smnd)
|
| Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT to #7 Response to Memorandum and Order to Show Cause by Plaintiff Robert Trent DeBella. (smnd) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Robert Trent DeBella re #4 Memorandum and Order to Show Cause. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (Doc. #5 ) is granted. Plaintiff is granted until February 5, 2024, in which to show good cause, in writing to the undersigned, why Plaintiff's Complaint should not be dismissed for the reasons stated in the Court's MOSC at Doc. #4 . Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 12/19/23. Mailed to pro se party Robert Trent DeBella by regular mail. (smnd)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #4 Memorandum and Order to Show Cause by Plaintiff Robert Trent DeBella. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is granted. Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the remainder of the $350.00 filing fee. The agency having custody of Plaintiff shall forward payments from Plaintiff's account in installments calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The Clerk is to transmit a copy of this order to Plaintiff, to the finance office at the institution where Plaintiff is currently confined, and to the Court's finance office. Plaintiff is granted until January 5, 2024, in which to show good cause, in writing to the undersigned, why Plaintiff's Complaint should not be dismissed. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 12/05/23. Mailed to pro se party Robert Trent DeBella and to the Jackson County Jail Finance Office by regular mail; e-mailed to the court's finance office. (smnd)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis mailed to pro se party Robert Trent DeBella by regular mail. Response deadline 1/3/2024. (smnd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Robert Trent DeBella. NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Robert Trent DeBella. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
