Nolan v. Conestoga Energy Partners, LLC
Quentin Nolan |
Conestoga Energy Partners, LLC |
5:2023cv04041 |
June 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Toby Crouse |
Rachel E Schwartz |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Conestoga Energy Partners, LLC.(Michel, Larry) |
Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Conestoga Energy Partners, LLC identifying None as corporate parent . (Michel, Larry) |
Filing 5 INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for August 16, 2023, at 3:00 p.m. by telephone (CONFERENCE LINE 1-888-363-4749; ACCESS CODE 5705809) before Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz. Rule 26 Planning Conference Deadline 7/26/2023. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures Deadline set for 8/4/2023. Proposed Scheduling Order Deadline 8/4/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz on 07/06/2023. (drk) |
Filing 4 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 07/17/2023 for Defendant Conestoga Energy Partners, LLC to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 06/29/2023. (nao) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Quentin Nolan upon Conestoga Energy Partners, LLC served on 6/12/2023, answer due 7/3/2023 (Johnson, Alan) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Toby Crouse and Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (nao) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Conestoga Energy Partners, LLC. (issued to Attorney for service) Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge Form provided to counsel for service with complaint. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (nao) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Quentin Nolan. (Duenes, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Topeka (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6077110.), filed by Quentin Nolan. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Join Litigation)(Duenes, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Nolan v. Conestoga Energy Partners, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Quentin Nolan | |
Represented By: | Michael Joseph Duenes |
Represented By: | Alan V. Johnson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Conestoga Energy Partners, LLC | |
Represented By: | Larry G. Michel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.