Neff (ID 63388) v. Phillips et al
Michael A. Neff |
Andre Phillips, Charles Kemple, Benjamin Schaefer, Jeff Easter, Sharon Barnett and Charles Kimple |
5:2024cv03028 |
February 19, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Gwynne E Birzer |
John W Broomes |
John W Lungstrum |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE: Case reassigned to District Judge John W. Broomes and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all further proceedings. District Judge John W. Lungstrum no longer assigned to case. Entered by Deputy Clerk on 03/11/24. Mailed to pro se party Michael A. Neff by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd) |
|
WAIVER OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS ISSUED as to Defendants Charles Kimple, Andre Phillips and Benjamin Schaefer. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd) |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Michael A. Neff. (smnd) |
|
|
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Michael A. Neff. (smnd) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Michael A. Neff. NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Inmate Account Statement) (smnd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Michael A. Neff. (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.