Waterman (ID 126456) v. Zmuda et al
| Brian Michael Waterman |
| (fnu) Koob, John Doe (2), (fnu) Fox, John Doe (1), Melissa Waldock, (fnu) Wilson, John Doe, Jeff Zmuda, Jane Doe and Centurion |
| 5:2024cv03239 |
| December 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| John W Lungstrum |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff is granted until January 30, 2025, to submit the $405.00 filing fee or to show good cause, in writing to the undersigned, why the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) should not apply. The failure to respond by the deadline will result in the dismissal of this matter without prejudice and without additional prior notice. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 12/30/24. Mailed to pro se party Brian Michael Waterman by regular mail. (smnd)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Brian Michael Waterman. NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Statement) (smnd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Brian Michael Waterman. (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
