Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation |
United States Department of the Interior, United States of America, Indian Health Service and United States Department of Health and Human Services |
5:2024cv04083 |
August 21, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Gwynne E Birzer |
John W Broomes |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation upon United States Department of Health and Human Services served on 8/28/2024, answer due 9/18/2024 (Follis, William) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation upon United States Department of the Interior served on 8/28/2024, answer due 9/18/2024 (Follis, William) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Defendant Indian Health Service served 8/28/2024 by certified mail, answer due 9/18/2024. (Follis, William) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- United States Attorney served 8/29/2024 by certified mail, answer due 10/28/2024. (Follis, William) Modified on 9/12/2024 to change the party served. (mam) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- United States Attorney General served 8/28/2024 by certified mail. (Follis, William) Modified on 9/12/2024 to change the service date based on the attached USPS tracking. (mam) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Conly J. Schulte for Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 8/26/24. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ala) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Indian Health Service, United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of the Interior, United States of America, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (issued to Attorney for service) Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge Form provided to counsel for service with complaint. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (nac) |
Filing 4 MOTION for attorney Conly Schulte to appear pro hac vice (Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6447872.) by Plaintiff Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation. (Attachments: #1 ECF Registration Form Pro Hac Vice - Conly Schulte)(Follis, William) |
Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation - trial to be held in Topeka. (Follis, William) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation. (Follis, William) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Topeka (Filing fee $405, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6447639.), filed by Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation. (Follis, William) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W. Broomes and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (jk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.