Wallace B. Roderick Revocable Living Trust v. XTO Energy, Inc.
| Wallace B. Roderick Revocable Living Trust |
| XTO Energy, Inc. |
| 6:2008cv01330 |
| October 24, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Kearny |
| Karen M. Humphreys |
| J. Thomas Marten |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
340
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER directing that plaintiffs have until July 28, 2015 to re-file their initial briefs for pending Motions (Dkts. 278, 280, 282). Signed by Chief Judge J. Thomas Marten on 7/14/15. (mss)
|
|
Filing
336
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 329 XTO's Motion to Stay Case. Signed by Chief Judge J. Thomas Marten on 2/24/15. (mss)
|
|
Filing
323
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 226 Motion to Consolidate Cases. Signed by Chief Judge J. Thomas Marten on 12/30/2014. (smg)
|
|
Filing
201
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 172 plaintiff's Motion to Certify Class; granting 189 defendant's Motion to Certify Class; and denying 193 defendant's Motion for Hearing. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 3/27/2012. (mss)
|
|
Filing
170
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying without prejudice 149 Motion to Certify Class and granting, as provided in the Order, 157 Motion to Sever. The Plaintiff shall file its motion for class certification as to the remaining claims on or before July 8, 2 001. The Court hereby directs that all claims relating to Oklahoma wells are hereby SEVERED from the remaining claims in this action; the Clerk of the Court shall then transfer the severed claims to the Eastern District of Oklahoma. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 6/1/2011. (alm) Modified on 6/3/2011 to add text. (alm).
|
|
Filing
141
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 111 plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 9/29/10. (mss)
|
|
Filing
110
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 47 defendant's Motion to Dismiss; granting 49 defendant's Motion to Dismiss; granting 53 defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; and denying 80 defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 1/11/10. (mss)
|
|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 13 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint; denying 22 Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Surreply. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen M. Humphreys on 3/9/09. (sj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wallace B. Roderick Revocable Living Trust v. XTO Energy, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Wallace B. Roderick Revocable Living Trust | |
| Represented By: | Rex A. Sharp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: XTO Energy, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Douglas M. Crotty, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
