Linnebur v. United Telephone Association, Inc.
| Evelyn Jean Linnebur |
| United Telephone Association, Inc. |
| 6:2010cv01379 |
| November 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Wichita Office |
| Ford |
| Richard D. Rogers |
| K. Gary Sebelius |
| Employment |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
228
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 219 Motion to Strike defendant's reply or 219 Motion for leave to file sur-reply is denied 160 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. Signed by Senior District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 7/22/2013. (mb)
|
|
Filing
189
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying without prejudice to refiling 153 Motion for Sanctions. To the extent she wishes to do so, the court sua sponte grants plaintiff leave to take further discovery regarding the spoliation of evidence. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius on 6/21/2012. (bh)
|
|
Filing
149
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IMPOSING DISCOVERY SANCTIONS. Defense counsel shall pay fifty percent of plaintiff's reasonable fees and expenses incurred as a result of filing 64 her second motion to compel, and defense counsel shall pay all of plaintif f's reasonable fees and expenses incurred as a result of filing 85 her third motion to compel. Within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order, plaintiff may file a motion for an award of reasonable fees and expenses. She should set forth all fees and expenses incurred as a result of filing the motions, and the court will apply the percentage reduction when it rules on the amount of the award. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius on 4/9/2012. (bh)
|
|
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 64 Motion to Compel. Within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order, defendant shall produce documents responsive to Request Nos. 33, 37, 38 (as modified), 39, 40, 43, 44, 45, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 (as modified), 54, 55, 57, 58, 59, 61, 65, 67, 68, and defendant shall answer in full Interrogatory No. 14. Within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order, defendant shall show cause in writing to the magistrate judge why it should not be taxed with plaintiff's reasonable expenses incurred as a result of filing the instant motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius on 10/27/2011. (bh)
|
|
Filing
68
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 31 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius on 8/10/2011. (bh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Linnebur v. United Telephone Association, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Evelyn Jean Linnebur | |
| Represented By: | Boyd A. Byers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United Telephone Association, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
