Cumis Insurance Society Inc v. Keilig

Defendant: Mark Keilig
Plaintiff: Cumis Insurance Society Inc
Case Number: 6:2011cv01115
Filed: April 25, 2011
Court: Kansas District Court
Office: Wichita Office
County: Norton
Presiding Judge: Eric F. Melgren
Referring Judge: David J. Waxse
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 23, 2012 23 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by District Judge Eric F. Melgren on 1/23/2012. (cm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cumis Insurance Society Inc v. Keilig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Keilig
Represented By: Rrachelle R. Breckenridge
Represented By: Amy S. Lemley
Represented By: Tracy A. Oldemeyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cumis Insurance Society Inc
Represented By: Tony A. Potter
Represented By: J. Michael Lehman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.