Le et al v. NCO Financial Systems, Inc.

Plaintiff: Robert Le and Thuoc Etezazi
Defendant: NCO Financial Systems, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2011cv01194
Filed: July 19, 2011
Court: Kansas District Court
Office: Wichita Office
County: Sedgwick
Referring Judge: Kenneth G. Gale
Presiding Judge: Julie A. Robinson
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Le et al v. NCO Financial Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Le
Represented By: Alan J. Stecklein
Represented By: Charles D. Kugler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thuoc Etezazi
Represented By: Charles D. Kugler
Represented By: Alan J. Stecklein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NCO Financial Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Paul M. Croker
Represented By: Richmond M. Enochs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.