Nelson v. Acosta-Corrales et al
Plaintiff: Amanda Nelson
Defendant: Jose T. Acosta-Corrales and Deangelo Brothers, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2012cv01419
Filed: November 8, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Wichita Office
County: Saline
Presiding Judge: James P. O'Hara
Presiding Judge: Julie A. Robinson
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 143 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 80 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 128 Motion for Summary Judgment on the Survival Action. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 3/17/14. (mb)
January 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 121 ORDER denying 116 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 1/2/2014. (ah)
September 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER granting 85 plaintiff's motion to compel defendant to sign an authorization to obtain his employment information from the Social Security Administration. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 9/19/2013. (mb)
April 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 50 AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER. The court finds good cause to enter, in large part, the protective order submitted by the parties. However, the court has deleted the last sentence of paragraph 7 and all of original paragraph 8, both of which violated Guid eline 3 (regarding filings under seal) of the District of Kansas Guidelines for Agreed Protective Orders. The court notes that it rejected the parties' first proposed protective order, in part because it also violated Guideline 3. The court sp ecifically directed the parties to Guideline 3 and asked them to submit an agreed protective order that conformed to the Guidelines. Yet, they did not. Counsel are admonished to review all of the District's local rules and guidelines before proceeding in this litigation. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 4/8/2013. (ah)
March 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER: The court enters the parties' proposed agreed order authorizing disclosure of medical records of Christopher Scott Hays (deceased). The court amended the parties' proposed agreed order to remove language ordering non-parties to produce documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 3/27/2013. (ah)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nelson v. Acosta-Corrales et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Nelson
Represented By: Stephen L. Brave
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jose T. Acosta-Corrales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deangelo Brothers, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?