Lounds v. Lincare, Inc.

Plaintiff: Shawron Lounds
Defendant: Lincare, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2013cv01091
Filed: March 6, 2013
Court: Kansas District Court
Office: Wichita Office
County: Sedgwick
Presiding Judge: Richard D. Rogers
Referring Judge: K. Gary Sebelius
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 9, 2014 62 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 48 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 7/9/14. (meh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lounds v. Lincare, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawron Lounds
Represented By: Anne W. Schiavone
Represented By: Kirk D. Holman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lincare, Inc.
Represented By: Patricia A. Konopka(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Stephanie N. Scheck(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Jesse D. Tanksley(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.