Rogers v. Bank of America, N.A.
| Shelli F. Rogers |
| Bank of America, N.A. |
| 6:2013cv01333 |
| September 9, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Wichita Office |
| Sedgwick |
| Carlos Murguia |
| David J. Waxse |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 51 Plaintiff's Application for Attorneys' Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 11/21/2014. (byk)
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 34 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant's Supplemental Disclosures; and finding as moot 20 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant's Required Initial Disclosures. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37( c)(1), Defendant is hereby prohibited from using any witness who is not already listed in either its December 13, 2013 Initial Disclosures, May 22, 2014 supplemented disclosures, or August 26, 2014 Supplemental Disclosures to supply evidence on a mot ion, at a hearing, or at trial, unless Defendant makes a showing that its failure to disclose such witness was substantially justified or is harmless. To the extent that Defendant has a last known address and telephone number for the former employees listed in its Supplemental Disclosures, it shall provide this information to Plaintiff within 14 days of the date of this Order or advise Plaintiff that it does not have such information. It is further ordered that on or before 10/10/2014, Pl aintiff shall file an affidavit itemizing the reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, Plaintiff incurred in making the 34 Motion to Compel Defendant's Supplemental Disclosures. Defendant shall have until 10/24/2014, to file a response to the affidavit. The Court will then issue a second order, specifying the amount and time of payment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 9/19/2014. (byk)
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying in part and granting in part Defendant's 9 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 07/07/2014. (mg)
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying Plaintiff's 12 Motion to Strike as Untimely Defendant's 9 Motion to Dismiss. Further, Defendant's 15 Motionfor Leave to File Motion to Dismiss Out of Time is granted. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 04/11/2014. (mg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rogers v. Bank of America, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bank of America, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Cassandra L. Writz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shelli F. Rogers | |
| Represented By: | Todd E. Shadid |
| Represented By: | Joslyn M. Kusiak |
| Represented By: | Michelle L. Brenwald-Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
