Young, et al. vs. Son, et al.
| Steve Young and Eun J. Young |
| Ki Ok Son, Hye Jin Son and Across Construction Corporation |
| 6:2014cv01154 |
| May 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Wichita Office |
| Sedgwick |
| Monti L. Belot |
| Karen M. Humphreys |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
114
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 112 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW AND CLOSING ARGUMENTS. Plaintiffs Steve Young and Eun Young shall recover of the defendants Ki Ok Son and Hye Jin Son the sum of $165,000 on plaintiffs' claim for br each of contract. Plaintiffs' claim for conversion is denied as moot. Defendants' claim for set-off is denied. Defendants' motion for directed verdict (Dkt. 112) is denied. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 7/28/2017. (mam)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 6 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants' motion to dismiss Ok Son and Across America for lack of personal jurisdiction is denied. Hye Jin Ha's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is granted. Defendants' motion to transfer venue is denied. Signed by District Judge Monti L. Belot on 11/3/14. (smg)
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Signed by District Judge Monti L. Belot on 10/2/2014. (smg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
