Looper v. Salem Hospital, Inc.
Plaintiff: Katherine A. Looper
Defendant: Salem Hospital, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2014cv01343
Filed: October 21, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Wichita Office
County: Marion
Presiding Judge: Karen M. Humphreys
Presiding Judge: John W. Lungstrum
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying as moot 4 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count Two of plaintiff's complaint. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 12/08/2014. (ses)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Looper v. Salem Hospital, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Salem Hospital, Inc.
Represented By: Alan L. Rupe
Represented By: Jessica L. Skladzien
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Katherine A. Looper
Represented By: Nathanael W. Berg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?