Coleman v. Apple Eight Overland Park, LLC et al
Ann Coleman |
Apple Eight Overland Park, LLC, Apple Eight Hospitality Management, Inc., Apple Eight Services Overland Park, Inc., Apple Eight Hospitality Midwest, LLC, Marriott International, Inc. and Marriott Hotel Services, Inc. |
6:2016cv01343 |
September 6, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Wichita Office |
Sedgwick |
Teresa J. James |
J. Thomas Marten |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 76 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 71 Motion for Review. The Magistrate Judge's Order 59 permitting the filing of an amendment complaint and allowing substitution of parties is AFFIRMED. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 5/8/2017. (sz) |
Filing 60 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part 30 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Response deadline 3/22/2017. Signed by Chief Judge J. Thomas Marten on 3/13/2017. (sz) |
Filing 44 ORDER denying 41 Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Reply in Support of her Motion to Amend Pleadings, or in the Alternative, for Leave to File Surreply. It is further ordered that Defendants' request for oral argument on [2 7] Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, Motion to Substitute Party is granted. A limited evidentiary hearing will be set by further Order of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 2/10/2017. (byk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.