King et al v. United States of America et al
| LaTasha Bradley and Timothy King |
| United States of America, Kristine Aulepp, Jane Doe and John Doe |
| 6:2016cv01435 |
| December 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Wichita Office |
| Sedgwick |
| Eric F. Melgren |
| Gerald L. Rushfelt |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 25 DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; granting 39 MOTION TO DEFER RULING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Defendant Maye is dismissed from this lawsuit. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is denied without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Eric F. Melgren on 9/27/2017. (mam)
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 28 Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery. Plaintiffs are permitted to conduct discovery limited to the threshold issue of qualified immunity and on matters bearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 8/29/2017. (ts)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 3 Motion to Expedite. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald L. Rushfelt on 4/3/17. (kao)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
