Rees v. Harden Healthcare Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff: Ashleigh Rees
Defendant: Harden Healthcare Holdings, LLC
Case Number: 6:2017cv01096
Filed: April 27, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Wichita Office
County: Sedgwick
Presiding Judge: J. Thomas Marten
Presiding Judge: K. Gary Sebelius
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 12 PROTECTIVE ORDER. The parties shall abide by the terms of the order. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius on 7/31/2017. (wh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rees v. Harden Healthcare Holdings, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashleigh Rees
Represented By: Nathan Elliott
Represented By: Sean M. McGivern
Represented By: Katy E. Tompkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harden Healthcare Holdings, LLC
Represented By: Karen Kessler Cain
Represented By: Uzoamaka Nwonwu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?