May v. Rottinghaus Company, Inc.
| Cornelius May |
| Rottinghaus Company, Inc. |
| 6:2019cv01007 |
| January 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Gwynne E Birzer |
| John W Broomes |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Cornelius May re #9 Second MOTION for More Definite Statement and Memorandum in Support (Attachments: #1 Ex. A, #2 Ex. B)(McGivern, Sean) |
Filing 10
ORDER finding as moot #7 Defendant's Motion for a More Definite Statement in light of Plaintiff filing an Amended Complaint and Defendant filing a Second Motion for More Definite Statement based on the Amended Complaint #9 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 2/26/19. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (rel)
|
| Filing 9 Second MOTION for More Definite Statement and Memorandum in Support by Defendant Rottinghaus Company, Inc. (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (Ehrlich, Alisa) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Rottinghaus Company, Inc., filed by Cornelius May.(McGivern, Sean) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for More Definite Statement by Defendant Rottinghaus Company, Inc. (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (Ehrlich, Alisa) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE by Defendant Rottinghaus Company, Inc. . (Ehrlich, Alisa) |
| Filing 5 STATE COURT RECORDS from Sedgwick County District Court. (Ehrlich, Alisa) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W. Broomes and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jk) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Rottinghaus Company, Inc. identifying none as corporate parent . (Ehrlich, Alisa) |
| Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Defendant Rottinghaus Company, Inc. - trial to be held in Wichita. (Ehrlich, Alisa) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Defendant Rottinghaus Company, Inc.. (Ehrlich, Alisa) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Sedgwick County District Court, case number 2018-CV-2038 Trial location of Wichita ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4681532.), filed by Rottinghaus Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pldgs)(Ehrlich, Alisa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: May v. Rottinghaus Company, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cornelius May | |
| Represented By: | Sean M. McGivern |
| Represented By: | Donald N. Peterson, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Rottinghaus Company, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Alisa Nickel Ehrlich |
| Represented By: | Kyle W. Malone |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
