Smithback v. Smithback et al
Robert Norman Smithback |
William Andrew Smithback and Terry Edwin Justice |
6:2019cv01103 |
April 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Gwynne E Birzer |
John W Broomes |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Robert Norman Smithback - trial to be held in Wichita. (jk) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Robert Norman Smithback. (jk) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Designation of place of trial and civil cover sheet are missing. The filing party is directed to correct the deficiencies immediately. Mailed to pro se plaintiff Robert Norman Smithback at the Stiles Unit by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (mam) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Robert Norman Smithback. (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (mam) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Robert Norman Smithback. (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Inability to Pay Costs) NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. (mam) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Robert Norman Smithback. (mam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.