Schroeder v. Cheyenne Manufacturing
| Joseph H. Schroeder, II |
| Cheyenne Manufacturing |
| 6:2019cv01130 |
| May 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Wichita Office |
| John W Broomes |
| Kenneth G Gale |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 JUDGMENT. The action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by deputy clerk on 7/17/2019. Mailed to pro se party Joseph H. Schroeder, II at 300 S. Woodlawn #222 Derby, KS 67037 by regular mail. (mam) |
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting #4 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. The action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge John W. Broomes on 7/17/2019. Mailed to pro se party Joseph H. Schroeder, II at 300 S. Woodlawn #222 Derby, KS 67037 by regular mail. (mam)
|
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Cheyenne Manufacturing (issued to US Marshal for service). (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) NEF was mailed to pro se Plaintiff Joseph H. Schroeder, II at 300 S. Woodlawn #222, Derby, KS 67037. (jk) |
|
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 5/22/19. Mailed to pro se party Joseph H. Schroeder II by regular mail. (df)
|
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Cheyenne Manufacturing identifying None as corporate parent . (Ayesh, Mark) |
| Filing 6 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by David M. Hahn on behalf of All Defendants. (Ayesh, Mark) Modified on 5/22/2019 to change the attorney. (mam) |
| Filing 5 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Mark G. Ayesh on behalf of All Defendants. (Ayesh, Mark) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Defendant Cheyenne Manufacturing (Ayesh, Mark) |
| NOTICE Re: Pro Se Mailing. Document #8 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis mailed to plaintiff on 5/22/2019 by regular mail. (aw) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Joseph H. Schroeder, II (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Financial Status). (referred to Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale) NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. (jk) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Joseph H. Schroeder, II. (jk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Wichita, filed by Joseph H. Schroeder, II. (jk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Schroeder v. Cheyenne Manufacturing | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cheyenne Manufacturing | |
| Represented By: | David Michael Hahn |
| Represented By: | Mark G. Ayesh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joseph H. Schroeder, II | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
