Rogers v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff: Randal Rogers
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party: Social Security Regional Administrator
Case Number: 6:2019cv01134
Filed: May 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: John W Lungstrum
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2019 Opinion or Order DOCKET ANNOTATION: On June 17, 2019, Andrew M. Saul replaced Nancy A. Berryhill as the Commissioner of Social Security. The party text for the defendant Social Security Administration, Commissioner of has been updated to reflect this change. (mam)
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons Returned Executed -- served by Certified Mail on 6/17/2019 Summons served on United States Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Served Atty General 6/17/19)(Overton, Kathleen)
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Summons Returned Executed -- served by Certified mail on 6/12/2019 Summons served on Office of the Regional Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Served Office of Regional Counsel 6/12/19)(Overton, Kathleen)
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Summons Returned Executed -- served by Certified mail on 6/12/2019 Social Security Administration, Commissioner of served on 6/12/2019, answer due 8/12/2019. Summons served on United States Attorney. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit served US Atty 6-12-19)(Overton, Kathleen)
June 10, 2019 Opinion or Order SUMMONS ISSUED as to Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (issued to Attorney for service). (jk)
May 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Randal Rogers - trial to be held in Wichita. (Overton, Kathleen)
May 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Randal Rogers. (Overton, Kathleen)
May 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Wichita ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4814395.), filed by Randal Rogers.(Overton, Kathleen)
May 22, 2019 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W. Lungstrum for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rogers v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Randal Rogers
Represented By: Kathleen E. Overton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Regional Administrator
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?