Crader v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Kimberly Kay Crader |
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of |
Social Security Regional Administrator |
6:2019cv01268 |
October 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Julie A Robinson |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Summons Returned Executed -- United States Attorney General served by Certified Mail on 10/15/2019. (jk) |
Filing 11 Summons Returned Executed -- Office of the Regional Counsel served by Certified Mail on 10/11/2019. (jk) |
Filing 10 Summons Returned Executed -- United States Attorney served by Personal Service on 10/9/2019, answer due 12/9/2019. (jk) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall issue summons to the US Marshal or Deputy Marshal, who are appointed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(3). Plaintiff(s) counsel directed to IMMEDIATELY prepare and submit summon(s) to the Clerk for service. Signed by Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 10/4/2019. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (sn) |
Filing 8 ORDER sustaining #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Edward A. Wicklund for Kimberly Kay Crader pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Unless already registered, pro hac vice counsel should register for electronic notification pursuant to the court's Administrative Procedures by completing a CM/ECF Electronic Filing Registration Form at http://www.ksd.uscourts.gov/. Signed by Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 10/3/2019. (mam) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (Office of Regional Counsel), U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (issued to US Marshal for service). (mam) |
Filing 7 (DISREGARD, filed in error) -- ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall issue summons to the US Marshal or Deputy Marshal, who are appointed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(3). Plaintiff(s) or plaintiff(s) counsel directed to IMMEDIATELY prepare and submit summon(s) to the Clerk for service. Signed by Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 10/3/19. (hw) Modified on 10/4/2019 -- The Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #4 has not yet been ruled on. (mam) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC FILING REGISTRATION FORM of Edward A. Wicklund re motion for leave to appear pro hac vice #5 by Plaintiff Kimberly Kay Crader(gw) |
Filing 5 MOTION for attorney Edward A. Wicklund to appear pro hac vice (Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4937313.) by Plaintiff Kimberly Kay Crader. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in support of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice)(Overton, Kathleen) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. by Plaintiff Kimberly Kay Crader (Overton, Kathleen) |
Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Kimberly Kay Crader - trial to be held in Wichita. (Overton, Kathleen) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Kimberly Kay Crader. (Overton, Kathleen) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Wichita, filed by Kimberly Kay Crader.(Overton, Kathleen) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.