Rogers v. USA (DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE - All filings to be made in case no. 6:10-cr-10186-JWB-1.) 6:2019cv01321 | US District Court for the District of Kansas

Justia Dockets & Filings Tenth Circuit Kansas District Court Rogers v. USA (DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE - All filings to be made in case no. 6:10-cr-10186-JWB-1.)

Rogers v. USA (DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE - All filings to be made in case no. 6:10-cr-10186-JWB-1.)

Petitioner:	Raymond L. Rogers
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	6:2019cv01321
Filed:	December 2, 2019
Court:	US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge:	John W Broomes
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
December 11, 2019	Filing 1 JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED in accordance with the Memorandum and Order filed December 11, 2019, in 10-10186-01-JWB, that Defendant's motion to vacate sentence under 2255 (Doc. 215) is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. An appeal from a final order on a 2255 may not be taken absent a certificate of appealability, which may issue only if a petitioner has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2). The court concludes Defendant has failed to make such a showing and accordingly a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by deputy clerk on 12/11/2019. Mailed to pro se party Raymond L. Rogers by regular mail to FORREST CITY - FCI - MEDIUM Federal Correctional Institution Inmate Mail/Parcels PO Box 3000 Forrest City, AR 72336. (sz)
December 2, 2019	DOCKET ANNOTATION: DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE - All filings to be made in case no. 6:10-cr-10186-JWB-1. (mam)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 11, 2019

Filing 1 JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED in accordance with the Memorandum and Order filed December 11, 2019, in 10-10186-01-JWB, that Defendant's motion to vacate sentence under 2255 (Doc. 215) is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. An appeal from a final order on a 2255 may not be taken absent a certificate of appealability, which may issue only if a petitioner has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2). The court concludes Defendant has failed to make such a showing and accordingly a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by deputy clerk on 12/11/2019. Mailed to pro se party Raymond L. Rogers by regular mail to FORREST CITY - FCI - MEDIUM Federal Correctional Institution Inmate Mail/Parcels PO Box 3000 Forrest City, AR 72336. (sz)

December 2, 2019

DOCKET ANNOTATION: DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE - All filings to be made in case no. 6:10-cr-10186-JWB-1. (mam)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rogers v. USA (DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE - All filings to be made in case no. 6:10-cr-10186-JWB-1.)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By:	Aaron L. Smith
Represented By:	Lanny D. Welch
Represented By:	Annette B. Gurney
Represented By:	James A. Brown
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Raymond L. Rogers
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?