Lazzo v. Frontier Wealth Management, LLC
Lazzo and Mark Lazzo |
Frontier Wealth Management, LLC |
6:2020cv01075 |
March 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Daniel D Crabtree |
James P O'Hara |
Securities/Commodities |
28 U.S.C. § 1391 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 AFFIDAVIT of Shawn Sokolosky re #11 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and to Stay or Otherwise Dismiss This Proceeding MOTION to Stay Case MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Frontier Wealth Management, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Perry, Braden) |
Filing 16 AFFIDAVIT of Frank Derby re #11 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and to Stay or Otherwise Dismiss This Proceeding MOTION to Stay Case MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Frontier Wealth Management, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11)(Perry, Braden) |
Filing 15 REPLY TO RESPONSE TO MOTION by Defendant Frontier Wealth Management, LLC re: #11 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and to Stay or Otherwise Dismiss This Proceeding MOTION to Stay Case MOTION to Dismiss (Perry, Braden) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Mark Lazzo re #11 Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay or Otherwise Dismiss This Proceeding. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K)(Griffin, William) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Sharron E. Ash for Frontier Wealth Management, LLC pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 4/14/2020. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (hw) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Frank E. Derby for Frontier Wealth Management, LLC pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 4/14/2020. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (hw) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and to Stay or Otherwise Dismiss This Proceeding by Defendant Frontier Wealth Management, LLC. (Perry, Braden) Added Motion to Stay Case and Motion to Dismiss on 4/14/2020. (mam) |
Filing 10 MOTION for attorney Sharron E. Ash to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5115899.) by Defendant Frontier Wealth Management, LLC (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit, #2 ECF Registration Form Electronic Filing Registration Form)(Perry, Braden) |
Filing 9 MOTION for attorney Frank E. Derby to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5115881.) by Defendant Frontier Wealth Management, LLC (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 ECF Registration Form)(Perry, Braden) |
Filing 8 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Braden M. Perry on behalf of Frontier Wealth Management, LLC. (Perry, Braden) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Frontier Wealth Management, LLC (issued to Attorney for service). (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (jk) |
Filing 7 ORDER denying #6 plaintiff's motion for leave to file exhibits under seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 3/23/20. (jc) |
Filing 6 SEALED MOTION for Leave to File Under Seal Pltf's Exhibits C, D, and E of His Complaint by Plaintiff Mark Lazzo (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit C, #2 Exhibit D, #3 Exhibit E)(Griffin, William) |
Filing 5 ORDER denying, without prejudice, motion to withdraw or seal exhibits (ECF No. 4). The motion states in a conclusory manner that the exhibits to plaintiff's complaint "contain confidential information that should not be made public and that would be too onerous to redact." At this stage, plaintiff has not demonstrated good cause to withdraw or seal any of these exhibits and thereby override the public's right of access to judicial records. For guidance on this legal standard, the court directs plaintiff's attention to Allen v. Kline, No. 07-2037, 2007 WL 3396470 (D. Kan. Nov. 13, 2007). Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 3/18/20. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jc) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Withdraw Exhibits A-E to Complaint by Plaintiff Mark Lazzo (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Griffin, William) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Mark Lazzo. (Griffin, William) |
Filing 2 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Mark Lazzo - trial to be held in Wichita. (Griffin, William) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Wichita (Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5091059.), filed by Mark Lazzo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Griffin, William) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Civil cover sheet is missing. The filing party/attorney is directed to correct the deficiency immediately.(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jk) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.