Jones v. Wichita, Kansas, City of
Terrell Jones |
Wichita, Kansas, City of |
6:2020cv01131 |
May 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Kenneth G Gale |
Julie A Robinson |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 JUDGMENT. Signed by deputy clerk on 6/19/2020. Mailed to pro se party Terrell R. Jones by regular mail. (hw) |
Filing 9 ORDER adopting in part re #5 Report and Recommendations. This case is hereby dismissed. The Court declines to impose filing restrictions at this time. Signed by Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 6/19/2020. Mailed to pro se party Terrell R. Jones by regular mail. (hw) |
Filing 8 OBJECTION to #5 Report and Recommendations by Plaintiff Terrell Jones. (Titled "Motion in Opposition to Dismissal".) (mam) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE COURT by Terrell Jones. (Titled "Kansas Laws and Statutes Which Defendant Has Broken") (sz) |
Filing 6 OBJECTION to #5 Report and Recommendations by Plaintiff Terrell Jones. (mam) |
Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Dismissal (and for Filing Restrictions) re #1 Complaint filed by Terrell Jones. This document also serves as the Order granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The document is included as two entries in the Court's docketing system for administrative/tracking purposes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 6/2/2020.Mailed to pro se party Terrell Jones by certified mail. (df) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. This document also serves as the Report & Recommendation to the District Court of Dismissal and for Filing Restrictions. The document is included as two entries in the Court's docketing system for administrative/tracking purposes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 6/2/2020. (df) |
NOTICE Re: Pro Se Mailing. Document #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint filed by Terrell Jones, #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, mailed to Terrell Jones on 6/2/2020 by certified mail ; Certified Tracking Number 7019 0700 0000 5927 3356. (aw) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Terrell Jones. (referred to Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Financial Status) NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. (jk) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Terrell Jones. (jk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Wichita, filed by Terrell Jones. (jk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jones v. Wichita, Kansas, City of | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Terrell Jones | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wichita, Kansas, City of | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.