Jones v. Wichita, City of
Terrell R. Jones |
Wichita, City of |
6:2020cv01142 |
June 1, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Wichita Office |
Kenneth G Gale |
Julie A Robinson |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 JUDGMENT. Signed by deputy clerk on 6/22/2020. Mailed to pro se party Terrell R. Jones by regular mail. (hw) |
Filing 7 ORDER adopting re #5 Report and Recommendations. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that this case is dismissed in accordance with Judge Gale's June 2, 2020 Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5). The Court declines to impose filing restrictions at this time. Signed by Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 6/22/2020. Mailed to pro se party Terrell R. Jones by regular mail. (hw) |
Filing 6 DOCKET ANNOTATION: Plaintiff Terrell R. Jones is a registered pro se participant with ECF Notification only. (gw) |
Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Dismissal and for Filing Restrictions re #1 Complaint filed by Terrell R. Jones. This document also serves as the Order granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The document is included as two entries in the Court's docketing system for administrative/tracking purposes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 6/2/2020.Mailed to pro se party Terrell Jones by certified mail. (df) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. This document also serves as the Report & Recommendation to the District Court for dismissal and for filing restrictions. The document is included as two entries in the Court's docketing system for administrative/tracking purposes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 6/2/2020. Mailed to pro se party Terrell Jones by certified mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (df) |
NOTICE Re: Pro Se Mailing. Document #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint filed by Terrell R. Jones mailed to Terrell Jones, 1106 Inverness Dr., Wichita, KS 67218 on 6/2/2020 by certified mail ; Certified Tracking Number 7019 0700 0000 5927 3363. (aw) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Terrell R. Jones. NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. (referred to Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Financial Status) (mam) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Terrell R. Jones. (mam) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Wichita, filed by Terrell R. Jones. (mam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jones v. Wichita, City of | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wichita, City of | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Terrell R. Jones | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.