Wolfenbarger v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff: Denise Wolfenbarger
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party: Social Security Regional Administrator
Case Number: 6:2020cv01184
Filed: July 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Eric F Melgren
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2020 Filing 8 Summons Returned Executed -- Office of the Regional Counsel served by Certified Mail on 7/20/2020. (jk)
August 5, 2020 Filing 7 Summons Returned Executed -- United States Attorney General served by Certified Mail on 7/20/2020. (jk)
July 17, 2020 Filing 6 Summons Returned Executed -- served by Personal Service on 7/8/2020 Social Security Administration, Commissioner of served on 7/8/2020, answer due 9/8/2020. Summons served on United States Attorney. (sz)
July 7, 2020 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (issued to US Marshal for service) (sz)
July 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall issue summons to the US Marshal or Deputy Marshal, who are appointed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(3). Plaintiff(s) or plaintiff(s) counsel directed to IMMEDIATELY prepare and submit summon(s) to the Clerk for service. Signed by District Judge Eric F. Melgren on 7/6/2020. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (cm)
July 6, 2020 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Eric F. Melgren for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (mam)
July 2, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Denise Wolfenbarger. NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. (Overton, Kathleen)
July 2, 2020 Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Denise Wolfenbarger - trial to be held in Wichita. (Overton, Kathleen)
July 2, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Denise Wolfenbarger. (Overton, Kathleen)
July 2, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Wichita, filed by Denise Wolfenbarger. (Overton, Kathleen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wolfenbarger v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Denise Wolfenbarger
Represented By: Kathleen E. Overton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Regional Administrator
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?