Mendoza v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff: Dawna Mendoza
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party: Social Security Regional Administrator
Case Number: 6:2020cv01246
Filed: September 11, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: John W Broomes
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2020 Filing 8 Summons Returned Executed -- served by Certified Mail on 9/23/2020. Summons served on United States Attorney General. (sz)
September 29, 2020 Filing 7 Summons Returned Executed -- served by Certified Mail on 9/21/2020. Summons served on Office of the Regional Counsel. (sz)
September 21, 2020 Filing 6 Summons Returned Executed -- United States Attorney served by Personal Service on 9/18/2020, answer due 11/17/2020. (jk)
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall issue summons to the US Marshal or Deputy Marshal, who are appointed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(3). Plaintiff(s) or plaintiff(s) counsel directed to IMMEDIATELY prepare and submit summon(s) to the Clerk for service. Entered by District Judge John W. Broomes on 09/14/2020. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jmr)
September 14, 2020 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (issued to US Marshal for service). (jk)
September 11, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. by Plaintiff Dawna Mendoza (Overton, Kathleen)
September 11, 2020 Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Dawna Mendoza - trial to be held in Wichita. (Overton, Kathleen)
September 11, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Dawna Mendoza. (Overton, Kathleen)
September 11, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Wichita, filed by Dawna Mendoza.(Overton, Kathleen)
September 11, 2020 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W. Broomes for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mendoza v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dawna Mendoza
Represented By: Kathleen E. Overton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Regional Administrator
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?