Helm v. Lowe et al
| Matthew Helm |
| Keith Lowe and Terminal Consolidation Company |
| 6:2021cv01072 |
| March 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| John W Broomes |
| Kenneth G Gale |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 6/14/2021 at 10:00 AM by Telephone KGG - CONFERENCE LINE 1-888-363-4749 ACCESS CODE 5407703 before Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale. Report of Parties Planning Meeting deadline 6/7/2021. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures Deadline set for 6/7/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 5/10/21. (cc)
|
|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER re #11 Order to Show Cause. The Court has reviewed #13 Plaintiff's response to the Court's #11 Order to Show Cause and accepts the adequacy of Plaintiff's response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 5/10/21. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (df)
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE re #11 Order to Show Cause by Plaintiff Matthew Helm(Lykins, Brendan) |
| Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Terminal Consolidation Company identifying None as corporate parent . (Rogers, Shawn) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE regarding diversity jurisdiction. Show Cause Response due by 5/20/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 5/5/21. (df)
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Keith Lowe.(Rogers, Shawn) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Terminal Consolidation Company.(Rogers, Shawn) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting, for good cause shown and as unopposed, #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Responsive pleading shall be filed on or before May 3, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 4/26/21. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (df)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant Terminal Consolidation Company (referred to Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale) (Rogers, Shawn) |
| Filing 6 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 5/05/2021 for Defendant Keith Lowe to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 4/21/2021. (jk) |
| Filing 5 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 4/26/2021 for Defendant Terminal Consolidation Company to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 4/12/2021. (mam) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Matthew Helm upon Keith Lowe served on 3/31/2021, answer due 4/21/2021 (Lykins, Brendan) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- certified mail by Matthew Helm upon Terminal Consolidation Company served on 3/22/2021, answer due 4/12/2021 (Lykins, Brendan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Matthew Helm. (Lykins, Brendan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Wichita ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5440617.), filed by Matthew Helm.(Lykins, Brendan) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Keith Lowe, Terminal Consolidation Company (issued to Attorney for service). (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (jk) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W. Broomes and Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
