Rathbun v. Office Depot LLC et al
| Randall Rathbun |
| Office Depot LLC, Office Depot Business Solutions, LLC, Officemax Incorporated, Officemax North America, Inc. and ODP Corporation |
| 6:2021cv01279 |
| November 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| John W Broomes |
| James P O'Hara |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery deadline 5/16/2022. Mediation deadline 3/29/2022. Mediation Notice or Confidential Settlement Report Due to Magistrate Judge on 2/14/2022. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 5/23/2022. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/31/2022 at 11:00 AM in KC Courtroom 223 (JPO) before Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara. Dispositive motion deadline 7/1/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 1/20/22. (ss)
|
| Filing 17 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara: SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held on 1/20/2022. (AT&T conference line.) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ss) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF SERVICE by Office Depot LLC of Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures (Malicoat, Mary) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1) by Randall Rathbun (Spigarelli, Kala) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER: Pursuant to Stipulation of Dismissal (Doc. 10), the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8) is found as moot. Entered by District Judge John W. Broomes on 12/21/2021. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jmr)
|
|
Filing 13
INITIAL ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference set for 1/20/2022 at 9:00 AM by Telephone before Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara. Report of Parties Planning Meeting deadline 1/10/2022. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures Deadline set for 1/10/2022. All parties and counsel participating in this phone conference are directed to dial the conference center line 888-363-4749, using access code 8914911 to join the conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 12/10/21. (ss)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER: based on the dismissal of defendant ODP corporation (ECF No. 10) and for the reasons suggested in defendants' response to the order to show cause (ECF No. 11), the court finds defendants have shown good cause why this case shouldn't be remanded. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 12/10/2021. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(amh)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE by Defendants ODP Corporation, Officemax Incorporated, Office Depot Business Solutions, LLC, Office Depot LLC, Officemax North America, Inc. re #9 Order to Show Cause , RESPONSE re #9 Order to Show Cause by Defendants ODP Corporation, Officemax Incorporated, Office Depot Business Solutions, LLC, Office Depot LLC, Officemax North America, Inc.(Malicoat, Mary) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL by ODP Corporation, Office Depot Business Solutions, LLC, Office Depot LLC, Officemax Incorporated, Officemax North America, Inc.. (Malicoat, Mary) |
|
Filing 9
NOTICE AND ORDER TO DEFENDANTS TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 12/2/2021. (amh)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION by Defendants ODP Corporation, Office Depot Business Solutions, LLC, Officemax Incorporated, Officemax North America, Inc. (Malicoat, Mary) |
| Filing 7 Separate Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint by Office Depot LLC.(Malicoat, Mary) |
| Filing 6 DOCKET ANNOTATION: #5 Civil Cover Sheet - original version was uploaded blank. The corrected version is attached for noticing purposes. (jk) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Civil cover sheet is blank. The filing party/attorney is directed to correct the deficiency immediately. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jk) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W. Broomes and Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jk) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Defendants ODP Corporation, Office Depot Business Solutions, LLC, Office Depot LLC, Officemax Incorporated, Officemax North America, Inc.. (Malicoat, Mary) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/30/2021: #1 **corrected main document**) (jk). |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by ODP Corporation, Office Depot Business Solutions, LLC, Office Depot LLC, Officemax Incorporated, Officemax North America, Inc. identifying None as corporate parent (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List of subsidaries)(Malicoat, Mary) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY by ODP Corporation, Office Depot Business Solutions, LLC, Office Depot LLC, Officemax Incorporated, Officemax North America, Inc.. (Malicoat, Mary) |
| Filing 2 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Defendants ODP Corporation, Office Depot Business Solutions, LLC, Office Depot LLC, Officemax North America, Inc., Officemax, Inc. - trial to be held in Wichita. (Malicoat, Mary) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Eighteenth Judicial District, case number 2021-CV-001718-TP Trial location of Wichita ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5643951.), filed by ODP Corporation, Officemax, Inc., Office Depot Business Solutions, LLC, Office Depot LLC, Officemax North America, Inc..(Malicoat, Mary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
