Allen v. Sedgwick County District Attorney's Office
| Anthony Allen |
| Sedgwick County District Attorney's Office |
| 6:2021cv01300 |
| December 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kenneth G Gale |
| Holly L Teeter |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
JUDGMENT. Plaintiff's case is dismissed for failure to state a claim. This case is closed. Signed by deputy clerk on 1/26/2022. Mailed to pro se party Anthony Allen at 7814 E Douglas Ave. Apt. 208 Wichita, KS 67206 by regular mail. (mam)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER adopting #6 Magistrate Judge Gale's Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Holly L. Teeter on 1/26/2022. Mailed to pro se party Anthony Allen at 7814 E Douglas Ave. Apt. 208 Wichita, KS 67206 by regular mail. (mam)
|
|
Filing 6
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Dismissal re #1 Complaint filed by Anthony Allen. This document also serves as the MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel and granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. It is included in the Court's docketing system twice for administrative/tracking purposes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 1/3/22. Mailed to pro se party Anthony Allen by certified mail. (df)
|
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel and granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. This document also serves as the REPORT & RECOMMENDATION of Dismissal to the District Court. It is included in the Court's docketing system twice for administrative/tracking purposes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 1/3/21. Mailed to pro se party ANTHONY ALLEN by certified mail. (df)
|
|
DOCKET ANNOTATION re #5 / #6 : Documents sent by certified mail under tracking # 7019 0700 0000 5927 4728. (mam)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy by Plaintiff Anthony Allen. (referred to Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(sz)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Anthony Allen. (referred to Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale) (sz)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Anthony Allen. (sz)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT (No Summons Issued) with trial location of Wichita, filed by Anthony Allen.(sz)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Allen v. Sedgwick County District Attorney's Office | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Anthony Allen | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sedgwick County District Attorney's Office | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
