Aerospace Turbine Rotables, Inc. v. 818 Aviation, Inc.
Plaintiff: Aerospace Turbine Rotables, Inc.
Defendant: 818 Aviation, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2022cv01005
Filed: January 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Daniel D Crabtree
Referring Judge: James P O'Hara
2 Judge: Rachel E Schwartz
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE: Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara no longer assigned to case. Signed by deputy clerk on 3/4/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(kao)
February 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION by Plaintiff Aerospace Turbine Rotables, Inc. re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Gunderson, Scott)
February 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER STAYING PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS. The parties have informally notified the undersigned's chambers that they agree pretrial proceedings, including the scheduling of deadlines, should be stayed until after a decision is reached on defendant's motion to dismiss or transfer (ECF No. 8). The court finds a stay, which will conserve the time and resources of the parties and the court while awaiting the decision, is justified. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 2/15/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(srj)
February 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Christopher M. Kiernan for 818 Aviation, Inc. pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 2/3/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca)
February 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT of Christopher M. Kiernan re #10 MOTION for attorney Christopher M. Kiernan to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5701727.) by Defendant 818 Aviation, Inc.(Peterson, Donald)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION for attorney Christopher M. Kiernan to appear pro hac vice (Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5701727.) by Defendant 818 Aviation, Inc. (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 ECF Registration Form)(Peterson, Donald)
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Defendant 818 Aviation, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration)(Peterson, Donald)
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Defendant 818 Aviation, Inc. (Peterson, Donald)
January 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER regarding #4 order to show cause. The court is satisfied it has diversity subject matter jurisdiction. This matter shall proceed accordingly. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 1/10/2022. (srj)
January 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 RESPONSE re #4 Order to Show Cause by Plaintiff Aerospace Turbine Rotables, Inc.(Gunderson, Scott)
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Aerospace Turbine Rotables, Inc..(Gunderson, Scott)
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 1/24/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 1/7/2022. (srj)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Aerospace Turbine Rotables, Inc. identifying First Aviation Services, Inc. as corporate parent. (mam)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Aerospace Turbine Rotables, Inc. - trial to be held in Wichita. (Gunderson, Scott)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Wichita (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5677980.), filed by Aerospace Turbine Rotables, Inc. (Gunderson, Scott)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order SUMMONS ISSUED as to 818 Aviation, Inc. (issued to Attorney for service). (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (jk)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aerospace Turbine Rotables, Inc. v. 818 Aviation, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aerospace Turbine Rotables, Inc.
Represented By: Scott J. Gunderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 818 Aviation, Inc.
Represented By: Christopher M. Kiernan
Represented By: Donald N. Peterson, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?